Frameworks for High Dimensional Convex Optimization

Read PDF →

London, 2020

Category: Optimization

Overall Rating

3.1/5 (22/35 pts)

Score Breakdown

  • Latent Novelty Potential: 7/10
  • Cross Disciplinary Applicability: 6/10
  • Technical Timeliness: 6/10
  • Obscurity Advantage: 3/5

Synthesized Summary

  • The paper's primary contribution with potential for modern impact is the LOCO framework (Chapter 3), which uniquely applies theoretical Local Computation Algorithms (LCAs) to distributed convex optimization.

  • Instead of focusing on global consensus, LOCO enables agents to solve small, local problems defined by the sparsity structure of the constraint matrix, requiring minimal communication.

  • This distinct paradigm could inspire novel research in areas like Edge AI...

  • ...but its practical implementation challenges (e.g., the reliance on specific random rankings) and the potential for more specialized post-2020 methods to offer better practical trade-offs mean it's not a high-priority pursuit...

Optimist's View

  • The thesis's most promising contribution for fueling modern, unconventional research lies in Chapter 3, "Distributed Algorithm with Logarithmic Communication Complexity" (LOCO).

  • The core idea is the application of Local Computation Algorithms (LCAs) from theoretical computer science to distributed optimization problems, specifically in multi-agent systems.

  • This differs significantly from current Federated Learning by abandoning the goal of a single, collaboratively trained global model state.

  • This could unlock training/adaptation of truly massive models on resource-constrained, privacy-sensitive edge devices where current Federated Learning approaches are too communication-heavy or still require sharing too much information about the global model structure.

Skeptic's View

  • While the thesis tackles highly relevant problems... a skeptical review reveals several potential limitations and areas where the work may have been surpassed or is based on assumptions that limit its broader impact today.

  • The LOCO framework relies on generating a "random ordering" r of constraints which, as noted by the author citing [7, 169], "in practice... does not exist."

  • The theoretical guarantees for the sketched IPM (Theorem 27) are probabilistic (at least 0.9 probability), which is often less appealing than deterministic guarantees in some application domains...

  • Since 2020, research has likely produced highly specialized methods for specific problems tackled here... that might outperform these more generic "frameworks" by leveraging domain-specific structure more effectively.

Final Takeaway / Relevance

Watch