Combining Computation with Geometry

Read PDF →

Lien, 1985

Category: Computational Geometry

Overall Rating

2.4/5 (17/35 pts)

Score Breakdown

  • Cross Disciplinary Applicability: 5/10
  • Latent Novelty Potential: 4/10
  • Obscurity Advantage: 2/5
  • Technical Timeliness: 6/10

Synthesized Summary

The most specific, actionable, albeit narrow, path inspired by this thesis lies in the exploration of its R^m symbolic integration method for polynomial functions over high-dimensional polyhedra...

This technique, particularly its unique decomposition into cones from the origin, could potentially be revisited using modern symbolic libraries...

...to assess if it offers a viable, exact alternative for volume/integral calculations in specific niche applications like formal verification or certain types of probabilistic inference...

The majority of the paper's geometric techniques appear outdated and likely suffer from numerical fragility compared to modern robust approaches.

Optimist's View

The specific techniques proposed... are not the dominant approaches in mainstream modern computational geometry libraries or ML/AI frameworks.

The symbolic integration method for polynomials over arbitrary nonconvex polyhedra, especially its generalization to m-dimensional space, seems particularly promising for latent novelty...

The link mentioned in Chapter 10 about calculating probabilities over high-dimensional regions defined by linear inequalities (R^m polyhedra) is highly relevant to modern AI fields...

Modern symbolic math software... is vastly more powerful than in 1985, making the symbolic integration method proposed in Chapters 8-10 much more feasible and scalable...

Skeptic's View

The foundational assumption is a strong reliance on polyhedra (planar faces) as the primary geometric representation...

This lack of inherent numerical robustness renders the algorithms brittle for real-world, complex inputs.

The specific method... did not become a widely adopted standard... suggesting it might have had practical limitations...

The theoretical framework... is deeply tied to the assumption of planar faces and straight edges.

Final Takeaway / Relevance

Watch